Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26375836-20150527220737/@comment-26375836-20150530195827

Lolzy593 wrote: Enderspring wrote: Some of this is honestly breakingly true, I'm gonna try to list examples along with some other things.

The .0's have no reason to be here, thats just kind've... eh.

Why is there a toy balloon boy is balloon boy is already a toy animatronic?

Golden Balloon Boy, simple as that, just.. eh.

Heck, I still think Spring falls into one of these UO lines, but I don't care really, the point is: its a fanon wiki, everything here = not canon, and I honestly dont care if its unoriginal, you could say FNAF itself is unoriginal, because it took almost all inspiration from Chuck E. Cheeses, changed the places, animatronics, added security guard and office, did some story, wabam. If all this wiki could do is have users make UO ideas then it would be boring,NOT FUN AT ALL and useless if it's that simple to make an animatronic. Unless you want your wiki flooded with HORRIBLE IDEAS. I know it's a fanon wiki but it's not fun having UO ideas everywhere. You're supposed to get people to be creative, not this.... Also not just animatronics, everything would be UO if the idea of UO ideas wern't bothered to be checked or supported, I WOULDN'T BOTHER CONTRIBUTING. ehich is why I ask "Why do you keep the UO ideas alive"