Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26375836-20150527220737/@comment-25926749-20150531005420

Lolzy593 wrote: ManinBlack007JK wrote: Sorry, but my two cents:

Look, this for fanon ideas. I myself have Golden Foxy, The Mark IV animatronics, Metal Freddy, all of which are supposedly "Unoriginal ideas". This is to expand in the universe of Freddy's. Now, stubs and such need to improve, but we have no one to impress. This wiki is ours, not theirs. um THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT. OUR IDEAS ARE SUPPOSED TO ATTRACT EDITORS. THEY DO BUT IN A BAD WAY! Like how some "countries" attract criminal activity but that's not the point. The point is to build a community. How are we supposed to build one without ones that will attract GOOD editors? We're just gonna attract little kids that make bad ideas but to build a good community...YOU HAVE TO HAVE A NICE LOOKING WIKI. If it's not, It's gonna die of "lack of good editors". We do have good editors but not as much. I do see your point, but there's a difference between good and pretentious. Good editors tend to see the better side of characters. Enders point about my character, while it may seem selfcentered, is true. It's not just a copy of Toy Chica, it has a whole new story behind it. As long as a character has an original story and good premise, I'll buy it.