User blog comment:UUnlockedMario/Five Nights at Freddy's 2 is a Sequel/@comment-26434802-20150104052349

You contradict yourself numerous times. Adding to that, almost none of this is clear evidence, it's mostly pure speculation.

1.  Is not evidence. Though plausible. Though you should know, they did not and could not have had animatronics in 1887.

2. Is not evidence. Pure speculation. Adding to this, a line from Phone Guy on Night 1 "The first guy finished his week" which obviously means a week prior.

3. They were retrofitted with "current" technology. Also, not evidence as you lack a proper explanation for it.

4. Fredbear's Family Diner. Not evidence. Pure speculation.

5. You just contradicted yourself, you said it did take place in 1987 but now you're saying it must've been a typo? Also, not evidence

6. Speculation. And if so, why is the puppet there?

7. While you may fool a lot of people here, many things have "2" labled on them, even when they are in fact prequels. Some examples: The Godfather 2. The lion king 3

8. The number three on Fritz's slip is because he is the third employee at that pizzeria. Someone we don't know > Jeremy > Fritz. This also has nothing to do with it being a preque; or a sequel.

And in case you're wondering, what is concrete evidence? Things that are stated or are hinted to in the game or by Scott himself.

And as such, I shall be staying by the correct argument that FNaF 2 is indeed, a prequel.